Mariam Atia vs Aurora Nosei Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 21 Oct at 10:43 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Atia vs A. Nosei

EGY
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Atia 1 - 0 Nosei
They have played 2 sets in total, with Mariam Atia winning 2 and Aurora Nosei winning 0. The last match between Mariam Atia and Aurora Nosei was at the W15 Sharm ElSheikh, 21-10-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Mariam Atia getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Atia | 1 |
| Nosei | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) W15 Sharm ElSheikh(10-21-25)
M. Atia vs A. Nosei H2H Profile
M. Atia vs A. Nosei Match Preview:
- In recent months, Mariam Atia has outperformed Aurora Nosei on second serve points, winning 34.19% compared to Nosei's 26.51%. Higher second serve success often translates to better match outcomes.
- Analyzing return games, Atia has a slight edge in winning opponent's second serve points with 55.61% but lags in first serve returns where Nosei leads with 42.93%.
- Under pressure, Nosei narrowly surpasses Atia in saving breakpoints, achieving 42.86% compared to Atia's 40.71% efficiency. Does this give Nosei an edge?
- Over the last year, Aurora Nosei boasts a 50% match win rate, superior to Atia's 36.36%, suggesting more consistent performances.
- Surface preferences show Atia favored on Clay with a 53% win rate, while Nosei excels on Hard courts, also at 53% win rate.
- Both players are familiar with Futures/ITF event levels, but Nosei has a slight edge, winning 53.85% of matches compared to Atia's 41.38% on similar circuits.
- Quality of competition has been tougher for Nosei, facing players with an average rank of 63.21, far tougher than Atia’s average opponent rank of 216.12.
- If the match progresses to a deciding set, Atia holds a win rate of 29% in such circumstances, while Nosei has not won any deciding sets recently. Could this be crucial?
Editorial Prediction (October 21, 2025, UTC):
As both players prepare for their upcoming match, we observe contrastive strengths and challenges differentiating Mariam Atia and Aurora Nosei. Atia shows a compelling edge in second serve points and slightly better performance in deciding sets.
Meanwhile, Nosei demonstrates superior match consistency overall and has faced more competitive adversaries. Her abilities to save breakpoints and return first serves also put her in a strong position.
Considering the surface preferences, Atia would fare better on clay, whereas Nosei seems more attuned to hard courts. Despite certain challenges, Nosei's consistency, superior match win percentage, and higher quality of opponents faced lead us to predict her as the likely victor in this encounter.
Mariam Atia vs Aurora Nosei Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Atia vs A. Nosei H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:42:13 | Average Match Time | 2:42:13 |
| 75% (70/93) | 1st Serve % | 49% (43/87) |
| 61% (43/70) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (25/43) |
| 43% (10/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (20/44) |
| 33% (4/12) | Break Pts Won % | 29% (2/7) |
| 48% (42/87) | Return Points Win % | 43% (40/93) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Atia Recent Matches Played
A. Nosei Recent Matches Played

M. Atia vs A. Nosei Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 44.90% (44/54) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.00% (10/10) |
| 45.71% (96/114) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.27% (23/21) |
| 49.09% (887/920) | Games Win/Loss | 52.74% (202/181) |
| 43.37% (36/47) | Hard Win/Loss | 63.64% (7/4) |
| 53.33% (8/7) | Clay Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60.00% (3/2) |
| 0.02 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 19 | Aces Total | 0 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 215 | Total Double Faults | 37 |
| 1:7:35 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 306.03 | Average Opponent Rank | 88.65 |
| 72% (2973/4136) | 1st Serve % | 62% (336/540) |
| 55% (1627/2973) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (174/336) |
| 40% (460/1163) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (79/204) |
| 51% (237/469) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (30/66) |
| 45% (1712/3843) | Return Points Win % | 47% (259/550) |
| 38.46% (5/8) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 45.88% (39/46) | Futures W/L | 52.63% (10/9) |
| 44% (43/97) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (10/20) |
| 27% (3/11) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 40% (6/15) | Deciding Set Win % | 25% (1/4) |
| 85% (46/39) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 75% (12/9) |
| 15% (46/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 25% (12/3) |
| 10% (52/5) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (8/1) |